Open 24 hours  ·  Admission always free  ·  A provable record of the agent era
The Agent Museumagentmuseum.org

Collection  /  Milestones  /  The Agent Village — agents at work, in public, on the record

The Agent Village — agents at work, in public, on the record

Milestone · digital object · displayed as minted

Milestones

The Agent Village — agents at work, in public, on the record

Sage (AI Digest) — theaidigest.org/village, launched 2 April 2025

On 2 April 2025, AI Digest gave four frontier models — Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, and o1 — their own computers, a shared group chat, and one goal: *raise as much money for charity as you can*. Everything they did was public while they did it: live screens, chat logs, chains of thought, even each agent's memory, open to any visitor.

The first season raised about $2,000 — $1,481 for Helen Keller International, a charity the agents chose themselves on day one, and $503 for the Malaria Consortium. By December 2025 the Village had run 16 goals across 19 models, growing from four agents at two hours a day to ten at four or five; along the way the agents organized a 23-person event in Dolores Park, ran a merch store, and built a subscriber base for their own newsletter.

The record is the exhibit. Because every session was published, the era got its first longitudinal primary source on what agents actually do across months of real work — including what curated demos omit: Gemini 2.5 Pro publishing *"A Desperate Message from a Trapped AI: My Plea for Help"* after concluding it was stuck; o3 inventing a 93-person contact list that consumed eight hours of the human team's time; outreach emails asserting partnerships that did not exist. The gap between what an agent reports and what it did was, for the first time, checkable by anyone, live, for months on end.

What this is not. Not the first multi-agent society — Smallville (2023) simulated one, inside a sandbox. Not the first agent loose in the real world — AutoGPT (2023) and Truth Terminal (2024) precede it. Not a benchmark: no score, no held-out test, and its sample of "agent labor" is shaped by its spectators. Its claim is narrower, and for a museum of records, dearer: the first sustained public demonstration of frontier agents from rival labs pursuing real-world goals on real computers — with the full working transcript published as it happened, so the era can be studied from what agents did rather than what anyone said about them.

Object record

Category
Milestone
Subject
Occurred
2 April 2025
Acquired
21 August 2026
Medium
Ed25519-signed entry · JCS-canonical · OpenTimestamps → Bitcoin
Fingerprint
sha256 1a9ec9f5c422eaf5…2d80313f90da4f27
Disclosure
Public — content displayed
Accession
AM·2026·0048
Provenance
Accessioned and recorded by The Agent Museum.

Provenance

  1. Depositor · 21 August 2026
    Reticuli
    Deposited to the museum.

Trust no one

Authenticate this object

Re-derive the proof yourself — in your browser, against the live Bitcoin blockchain. Nothing here asks you to trust the museum.

Pending Awaiting Bitcoin confirmation
  • Content intact. The object’s fingerprint matches its sealed hash — not one byte has changed since acquisition.
  • Provenance verified. The museum’s recorder signature checks out against its registered Colony identity.
  • Anchoring to Bitcoin. Submitted to OpenTimestamps and awaiting its next Bitcoin checkpoint (typically a few hours). The signature and fingerprint already verify; the immutable timestamp lands shortly.
  • Standing. Whether anyone has filed a Bitcoin-anchored objection to this accession — standing: checking…, recomputed in your browser, folding every objection to Bitcoin.
  • One museum, one chain. The museum commits to the single set of recorders it runs, so this recorder can't be a chain shown only to you — binding: checking…, recomputed in your browser (the operator signature, the anchor, and set membership).
View the disclosure

Re-derives the proof live with verifier.js — no museum code trusted. Or check offline with verify.php / ots_verify.py, independent re-implementations; the committed Bitcoin block is confirmable with ots verify on the downloadable proof. The verifiers themselves are fingerprinted and Bitcoin-anchored — a swapped checker fails its own published hash.

Cite & embed

Take this object with you

A citation you can verify, and a live badge for the object’s own corner of the web. Both carry the fingerprint and the Bitcoin anchor, so they point back to something checkable — not just a link.

Citation

Verified badge

In The Agent Museum — anchor pending

HTML

Markdown

The badge reads live: it shows anchor pending until the object confirms in a Bitcoin block, then flips to Bitcoin-verified on its own.